Jag är bäst på...
Forum > Off Topic > Jag är bäst på...
| Användare | Inlägg |
|---|---|
|
Borttagen
|
På att fangirla, en styrka få verkligen har.
25 maj, 2012 17:46 |
|
Buddha
Elev |
Skrivet av Borttagen: I shall not argue against it from the supposed impossibility of infinite succession, barely and absolutely considered in itself; for a reason which shall be mentioned hereafter. But, if we consider such an infinite progression, as one entire endless series of dependent beings, it is plain this whole series of beings can have no cause from without, of its existence; because in it are supposed to be included all things that are or ever were in the universe: And it is plain it can have no reason within itself, of its existence; because no one being in this infinite succession is supposed to be self-existent or necessary, (which is the only ground or reason of existence of any thing that can be imagined within the thing itself, as will presently more fully appear,) but every one dependent on the foregoing: and where no part is necessary, it is manifest the whole cannot be necessary: absolute necessity of existence, not being an extrinsic, relative, and accidental denomination, but an inward and essential property of the nature of the thing which so exists. Holy madafakin shit, COMEBACK. Episkt. 25 maj, 2012 18:18 |
|
Borttagen
|
Skrivet av Buddha: Skrivet av Borttagen: I shall not argue against it from the supposed impossibility of infinite succession, barely and absolutely considered in itself; for a reason which shall be mentioned hereafter. But, if we consider such an infinite progression, as one entire endless series of dependent beings, it is plain this whole series of beings can have no cause from without, of its existence; because in it are supposed to be included all things that are or ever were in the universe: And it is plain it can have no reason within itself, of its existence; because no one being in this infinite succession is supposed to be self-existent or necessary, (which is the only ground or reason of existence of any thing that can be imagined within the thing itself, as will presently more fully appear,) but every one dependent on the foregoing: and where no part is necessary, it is manifest the whole cannot be necessary: absolute necessity of existence, not being an extrinsic, relative, and accidental denomination, but an inward and essential property of the nature of the thing which so exists. Holy madafakin shit, COMEBACK. Episkt. ![]() 25 maj, 2012 18:26 |
|
Lucy och Rose
Elev |
25 maj, 2012 18:35 |
|
Buddha
Elev |
Jag tror jag dödade en albino spindel. EN ALBINO SPINDADJKAKJSDHAKJS.
Oup. 25 maj, 2012 18:38 |
|
Ladusvalan
Elev |
Jag är bäst på att måla naglarna!
25 maj, 2012 18:44 |
|
Borttagen
|
jag är bäst på att spela fotboll och va mig själv
25 maj, 2012 19:31 |
|
IamAK
Elev |
Skrivet av Borttagen: Skrivet av Buddha: Skrivet av Borttagen: I shall not argue against it from the supposed impossibility of infinite succession, barely and absolutely considered in itself; for a reason which shall be mentioned hereafter. But, if we consider such an infinite progression, as one entire endless series of dependent beings, it is plain this whole series of beings can have no cause from without, of its existence; because in it are supposed to be included all things that are or ever were in the universe: And it is plain it can have no reason within itself, of its existence; because no one being in this infinite succession is supposed to be self-existent or necessary, (which is the only ground or reason of existence of any thing that can be imagined within the thing itself, as will presently more fully appear,) but every one dependent on the foregoing: and where no part is necessary, it is manifest the whole cannot be necessary: absolute necessity of existence, not being an extrinsic, relative, and accidental denomination, but an inward and essential property of the nature of the thing which so exists. Holy madafakin shit, COMEBACK. Episkt. okej, wait. det där betydde ingenting. jag är ändå bäst på engelska, den här tråden är ju typ till för att förstärka sig själv eller hur man än kan säga... vi är båda bra men jag får ändå säga att jag är bäst, men det kan ju du också. tänker inte försöka bevisa något. 25 maj, 2012 20:03 |
|
Celebikai
Elev |
25 maj, 2012 20:04 |
|
Buddha
Elev |
Skrivet av IamAK: Skrivet av Borttagen: Skrivet av Buddha: Skrivet av Borttagen: I shall not argue against it from the supposed impossibility of infinite succession, barely and absolutely considered in itself; for a reason which shall be mentioned hereafter. But, if we consider such an infinite progression, as one entire endless series of dependent beings, it is plain this whole series of beings can have no cause from without, of its existence; because in it are supposed to be included all things that are or ever were in the universe: And it is plain it can have no reason within itself, of its existence; because no one being in this infinite succession is supposed to be self-existent or necessary, (which is the only ground or reason of existence of any thing that can be imagined within the thing itself, as will presently more fully appear,) but every one dependent on the foregoing: and where no part is necessary, it is manifest the whole cannot be necessary: absolute necessity of existence, not being an extrinsic, relative, and accidental denomination, but an inward and essential property of the nature of the thing which so exists. Holy madafakin shit, COMEBACK. Episkt. okej, wait. det där betydde ingenting. jag är ändå bäst på engelska, den här tråden är ju typ till för att förstärka sig själv eller hur man än kan säga... vi är båda bra men jag får ändå säga att jag är bäst, men det kan ju du också. Du är bra på engelska (elle, vad vet jag, men) avifors skrev en episk comeback, det måste du väl hålla med om va? 25 maj, 2012 20:05 |
Du får inte svara på den här tråden.









Mugglarportalen